Legal Opinion

In Re Clark

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 2002No. 49S00-0008-DI-462PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER FINDING MISCONDUCT AND IMPOSING DISCIPLINE

Upon review of the report of the hearing officer appointed by this Court to hear evidence on the Disciplinary Commission’s Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action, we find that the respondent engaged in attorney misconduct.

Facts: Under Count 1, the Commission issued a subpoena duces tecum to the re spondent as part of its investigation of a grievance filed by respondent’s client. The respondent did not respond to the subpoena.

In Count 2, a client retained the respondent to represent her and her ward for claims arising out of an automobile…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API