Legal Opinion

Lange v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 2, 1971No. 42489PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

The issues on this appeal from a judgment are whether the trial court erred (1) in finding that defendant, Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, acted in “bad faith” in refusing to settle a personal-injury action against its insured for the limits of its automobile liability policy; and (2) in determining that plaintiff, a receiver appointed in statutory proceedings supplementary to execution of a deficiency judgment against the insured, is entitled to assert the claim against defendant insurer despite the insured’s refusal to do so.

On October 29,1959, defendant’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Quaderer v. Integrity Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Peterson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Boerger v. American General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Larson v. Anchor Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Norwood v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Reserve InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Roldan v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Kooyman Ex Rel. Kooyman v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. Helmbolt v. LeMars Mutual Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Ranger Ins. Co. v. Travelers Indem.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API