Legal Opinion

D'AMARIO v. State

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 5, 1996No. 96-72-M.PPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLANDERS, Justice.

This matter came before us pursuant to an order directing the parties to appeal’ and show cause why the issues raised in the petition for certiorari should not be decided without further briefing and argument. Having reviewed their memoranda, we perceive no cause why we should not decide the petition at this time. We therefore proceed to determine that a Superior Court motion justice improperly sanctioned the defendants for objecting to one of the plaintiffs discovery requests because they did so without having first ascertained whether the requested documents were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Newbury Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  3. Forte Bros., Inc. v. RONALD M. ASH & ASSOC., INC.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  4. United Missouri Bank of Kansas City, N.A. v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1989
  5. Limoges v. Eats RestaurantSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Heal v. HealSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  2. In re McKennaDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2017
  3. Kathryn Manning v. Peter J. Bellafiore, M.D.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
  4. Norman Laurence v. Rhode Island Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  5. Coutu v. Tracy, 00-3720 (r.I.super. 2004)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API