Legal Opinion
In re McKenna
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided April 14, 2017No. BK No: 17-10314PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Diane Pinkie, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
This memorandum details the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law supporting the Court’s bench ruling and order entered after hearing held on April 5, 2017 (Doc. #40), denying creditor Ronald Blanchard’s Emergency Motion for Bankruptcy Court to Find that Rule 11 Sanctions are Exempt from the Stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(4)1 (“Stay Exemption Motion,” Doc. #22). Debtor Keven McKen-na timely objected to the Stay Exemption Motion (“Objection,” Doc. #23). There appears to be some confusion amongst members of the bar, and perhaps…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- LeBlanc v. SalemCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Jamo v. Katahdin Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- McMullen v. Sevigny (In Re McMullen)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Eugene W. Alpern v. Phillip S. Lieb, Allen S. Gabe, and Phyllis AlpernCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re. KuppersteinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- In Re. KuppersteinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- Kupperstein v. SchallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019