Legal Opinion

Doe ex rel. Roe v. Orangeburg County School District No. 2

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 8, 1997No. 2765PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, Judge:

In this action for negligent supervision, Orangeburg County School District No. 2 (the school district) appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Jane Doe, by her Guardian ad Litem Mary Roe, and Mary Roe individually. Doe and Roe cross-appeal, arguing that the jury’s verdict was inadequate and thus the trial judge should have granted a new trial nisi additur. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

On February 16, 1994, Doe, a fourteen-year-old student at Bowman High School in Orangeburg, reported to her guidance counselor that she had been sexually assaulted earlier that day by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Angela Berry v. William DeloneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Clyburn v. Sumter County School District 17Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Hollins Ex Rel. Hollins v. Richland County School District OneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. DOE BY DOE v. Greenville Hosp. SystemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Barnes v. BarnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Staubes v. City of Folly BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Doe Ex Rel. Roe v. Orangeburg County School District No. 2Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. DOE BY ROE v. Orangeburg Cty. Sch. Dist.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. E.R. v. Beaufort County School DistrictDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API