Doe ex rel. Roe v. Orangeburg County School District No. 2
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEARN, Judge:
In this action for negligent supervision, Orangeburg County School District No. 2 (the school district) appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Jane Doe, by her Guardian ad Litem Mary Roe, and Mary Roe individually. Doe and Roe cross-appeal, arguing that the jury’s verdict was inadequate and thus the trial judge should have granted a new trial nisi additur. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
On February 16, 1994, Doe, a fourteen-year-old student at Bowman High School in Orangeburg, reported to her guidance counselor that she had been sexually assaulted earlier that day by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Angela Berry v. William DeloneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Clyburn v. Sumter County School District 17Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Hollins Ex Rel. Hollins v. Richland County School District OneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- DOE BY DOE v. Greenville Hosp. SystemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
- Barnes v. BarnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Staubes v. City of Folly BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Doe Ex Rel. Roe v. Orangeburg County School District No. 2Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- DOE BY ROE v. Orangeburg Cty. Sch. Dist.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- E.R. v. Beaufort County School DistrictDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024