Legal Opinion

Bass v. McLamb

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1966No. 274PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

There are two questions for determination by the Court: (1) Does the evidence offered by the plaintiff make out a case of actionable negligence against the defendants? (2) Does the plaintiff’s evidence, considered in the light most favorable to her, show that she was contributorily negligent as a matter of law?

Appellees do not seriously argue the question of whether there is sufficient evidence offered by the plaintiff to make out a case of actionable negligence against the defendants. However, we might observe in passing that our Court in the case of Saunders v. Warren, 267 N.C. 735, 149…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Burchette v. DAVIS DISTRIBUTING COMPANY OF DURHAMSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Saunders v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Johnson v. Wayne Thompson, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Meeks v. AtkesonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Williams v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Duke v. TankardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Johnson v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Smith v. StatonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API