Legal Opinion

Williams v. Hall

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 10, 1968No. 68SC150PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.

Two questions are presented for our determination: (1) Was the evidence offered by plaintiff sufficient to make out a case of actionable negligence against the defendants? (2) Did the plaintiff’s evidence, considered in the light most favorable to him, show that plaintiff’s intestate was contributorily negligent as a matter of law?

In their brief and argument on this appeal, defendants apparently have conceded, and we agree, that there was sufficient evidence of negligence on the part of defendant Hall to take that issue to the jury. Plaintiff alleged that defendants violated the provisions of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hood v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Waters v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Galloway v. HartmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Johnson v. Wayne Thompson, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Greene v. MeredithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Etheridge v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Duke v. TankardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. Ross v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API