Legal Opinion

Duke v. Tankard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1969No. 682SC374PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeitt, J.

In their brief, defendants concede that plaintiff’s evidence of negligence on the part of defendants was sufficient to carry the case to the jury on the first issue. They. contend, however, that plaintiff’s evidence, taken in the light most favorable to him, established con*565tributory negligence as a matter of law and that the trial judge erred in overruling defendants’ motion for judgment as of nonsuit interposed at the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence and renewed at the conclusion of all the evidence.

It is a well-established principle of law in this jurisdiction that a motion for judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Waters v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Burchette v. DAVIS DISTRIBUTING COMPANY OF DURHAMSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Galloway v. HartmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Johnson v. Wayne Thompson, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eatman v. BunnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Hood Logging & Timber Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API