Legal Opinion
Bentley v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided November 19, 2007No. 1:05-CV-526PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, Chief Judge.
This action comes before the Court on objections filed by Plaintiffs attorney, James R. Rinck (“Counsel”), to the Magistrate Judge’s September 20, 2007, Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that Counsel’s motion for award of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) be denied. This Court is required to make a de novo review upon the record of those portions of the R & R to which objection has been made, and may accept, reject, or modify any or all of the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- McGraw v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Horace Lee Dunlap v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Walker v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Sinkler v. BerryhillDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Michael Giles v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner, U.S. Social Security Administration1District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
- Sinkler v. BerryhillDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Mounce v. SSADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.