Legal Opinion
Michael Giles v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner, U.S. Social Security Administration1
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided February 20, 2020No. 17-cv-659-PBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Michael Giles v. Case No. 17-cv-659-PB Opinion No.
2020 DNH 025
Andrew Saul, Commissioner, U.S. Social Security Administration 1 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Attorney D. Lance Tillinghast seeks $38,710.00 in attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (“Section 406(b)”) for his successful representation of Social Security claimant Michael Giles. Pet. For Auth. of an Att’y Fee, Doc. No. 13. He argues that a fee agreement he executed with Giles in September 2015 entitles him to Section 406(b) fees, and that he would be entitled to attorney’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Crawford v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Joslyn v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Medina-Rivera v. MVM, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Clark v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jennifer L. Chase, v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
- Chase v. US Social Security Administration, CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
- Giles v. US Social Security Administration, Acting CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020