Legal Opinion

Sinkler v. Berryhill

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided July 10, 2018No. 6:14–CV–06460 EAWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge

INTRODUCTION

On July 6, 2017, Plaintiff Lakisha Janey Sinkler ("Plaintiff") filed a motion for attorneys' fees in the amount of $16,851.00 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Dkt. 19). The Commissioner of Social Security ("the Commissioner") did not object to the request, but the Commissioner did raise the issue of whether the motion had been timely filed. (Dkt. 21 at 3-4). On April 11, 2018, the Court issued a Decision and Order denying the motion for attorneys' fees as untimely. (Dkt. 23). In issuing its decision, the Court recognized that there…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Dale Wells, William Hlywa v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appeal of John S. HoggCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sinkler v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. Apuzza v. NYU Langone Long IslandDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
  3. Scott E. v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API