Legal Opinion
Kuehne & Nagel (AG & Co.) v. Geosource, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 5, 1989No. 88-2061PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:
This litigation arose out of the arrangements three freight forwarders — Kuehne & Nagel (AG & Co.) (Kuehne & Nagel), Pan-alpina Welttransport GmbH (Panalpina) and SGS Controll Co. mbH (SGS) — made with Geosource, Inc., and Ucamar Shipping & Transportation (Cayman) Ltd. (Ucamar) to ship cargo. For reasons that follow, we remand all of the claims for jury trial.
I. Background
The dispute in this case stems from an ill-fated deal between the three European freight forwarders and Ucamar to transport goods on through bills of lading from Europe to the Middle East. The…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Castleberry v. BranscumTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Harcon Barge Co. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Theresa Plant v. Blazer Financial Services, Inc. Of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company v. Balfour Maclaine International Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Balfour Maclaine International Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Orient Overseas Containers Lines (Uk) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Dr. Bettye R. Langley v. Jackson State University and Dr. Herman Smith, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.