Legal Opinion
Hayes v. McAra
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1911No. Docket No. 84PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error to Genesee; Wisner, J. Assumpsit by Stephen Y. R. Hayes against David E. McAra on a broker’s contract. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
A writing was made reading:
“Davison, November 3d, 1909.
“ S. V. R. Hates,
“Grand Rapids, Mich.
“I hereby give you the exclusive agency, and authorize you to sell my farm in Genesee county, Michigan, described as follows: The south half of the southeast quarter of section (7) township (7) north, range (8) east, for the sum of six thousand dollars ($6,000), net to me, on *199the following terms: $300 cash at time of sale, and $3,400 when possession is given, balance on mortgage, due in four years at 6%, privilege to pay $100 or more on any interest day.
“I agree that you shall add to my price…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carr v. LeavittMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Bunnel v. Taintor's administratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
- Obenauer v. SolomonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Bruce v. HastingsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1868
- Hillebrands v. NibbelinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harris v. Van VrankenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Dowell v. PumphreyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922