Legal Opinion

Humane Soc'y of the U.S. v. Perdue

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 1, 2018No. Civil Action No. 12–1582 (ABJ)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge

The U.S. Department of Agriculture ("USDA") oversees multiple federal programs established by Congress to promote certain agricultural commodities. These programs are funded by "checkoffs"-mandatory assessments that producers and importers pay on the sale or import of the commodity. The assessments are used to pay for a range of activities, including research and marketing of the commodities, and they subsidize well-known advertising campaigns, such as "Got Milk?," "Beef: It's What's for Dinner," and "The Incredible, Edible Egg." This case…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Humane Soc'y of the United States v. PerdueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. Cal. Cattlemen's Ass'n v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co., LTD. v. BruggemanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  4. Kasch v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API