Humane Soc'y of the United States v. Perdue
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Katsas, Circuit Judge:
In this case, a pork farmer contends that the government unlawfully has permitted funds for promoting the pork industry to be used instead for lobbying on the industry's behalf. We consider whether, on summary judgment, the farmer has proven his constitutional standing to maintain this lawsuit.
I
The Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Act requires the federal government to promote the American pork industry. The Act authorizes the government to collect assessments (often called "checkoffs") from pork producers to finance efforts to "strengthen the position…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- WA Alliance of Tech. Workers v. DHSCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Jennifer Seed v. EPACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
- Deripaska v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- District of Columbia v. U.S. Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.