Legal Opinion
Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co., LTD. v. Bruggeman
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 18, 2023No. 3:21-cv-08489Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JIAXING SUPER LIGHTING ELECTRIC Case No. 21-cv-08489-MMC APPLIANCE CO., LTD., 7 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT 8 SIGNIFY HOLDING B.V.'S MOTION v. TO DISMISS THIRD AMENDED 9 COMPLAINT JOHN BRUGGEMAN, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 12 Before the Court is defendant Signify Holding B.V.’s (“Signify”) motion, filed May 13 25, 2023, “to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint,” whereby Signify seeks dismissal of one 14 of the claims in the Third Amended Verified Complaint (“TAC”), the operative pleading in 15 the instant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Parrino v. FHP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.