Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1984No. 8326SC839PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant contends the court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of his automobile. He concedes that he voluntarily executed a consent to search, and that “a law-enforcement officer may conduct a search and make seizures, without a search warrant or other authorization, if consent to the search is given.” G.S. 15A-221(a); see Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219, 36 L.Ed. 2d 854, 858, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 2043-44 (1973); State v. Long, 293 N.C. 286, 293, 237 S.E. 2d 728, 732 (1977). He relies, however, on G.S. 15A-223(a), which provides…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. United States v. Jess Harlan WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Gray v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  5. State v. LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. Valdivia, R., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. State v. HarwoodIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Green v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API