State v. Williams
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
Defendant contends the court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of his automobile. He concedes that he voluntarily executed a consent to search, and that “a law-enforcement officer may conduct a search and make seizures, without a search warrant or other authorization, if consent to the search is given.” G.S. 15A-221(a); see Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219, 36 L.Ed. 2d 854, 858, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 2043-44 (1973); State v. Long, 293 N.C. 286, 293, 237 S.E. 2d 728, 732 (1977). He relies, however, on G.S. 15A-223(a), which provides…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- United States v. Jess Harlan WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Gray v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- State v. LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Commonwealth v. Valdivia, R., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- State v. HarwoodIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- Green v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.