Legal Opinion
Merrill Lynch & Co. v. City of Waterbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 5, 1994No. 12097PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
The plaintiffs, Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith (MLPF & S), Merrill Lynch Asset Management, Inc., Frederick M. Genung, and Edmund C. Hyland, appeal from the decision of the trial court staying the arbitration of the claims ruled arbitrable until after the completion of the judicial proceedings involving the nonarbitrable claims.1 The sole issue presented is whether a trial court, after finding certain claims to be arbitrable and compelling arbitration as to those claims, may then stay the arbitration proceedings until the nonarbitrable claims have been resolved by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Town of Newington v. MazzoccoliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Success Centers, Inc. v. Huntington Learning Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Fishman v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Freund v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ungerland v. MORGAN STANLEY AND CO., INC.Connecticut Superior Court · 2010