Legal Opinion
Womble v. Womble
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 3, 1910No. Civ. No. 734PublishedCited by 3 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Calaveras County. A. I. McSorley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Plaintiff conveyed an undivided one-half interest in real property to defendant, Sue M. Womble, in pursuance of a certain contract executed by said plaintiff and defendant, Alexander M. Womble, in the following terms: '
“In consideration of John T. Womble and his wife Mary A. Womble, of the County of Calaveras, State of California, deeding to Sue M. Womble, wife of Alexander M. Womble, of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California, one undivided one-half interest in and to all that certain lots and pieces or parcels of land containing in all four hundred and eighty (480) acres,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Behlow v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Hawley v. KafitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Liebrand v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Hiscock v. NortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Parrish v. HastingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
3Cited by3 opinions
- White v. HendleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- LaHue v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Cowan v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935