Legal Opinion

Hiscock v. Norton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1879PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Jackson. Bill to set aside a deed or to enforce an equitable lien on the land granted. Defendant Chilson appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

For several years before May-23, 1872, the complainant, a‘married woman, owned the northeast quarter of section fifteen, in the township of Sandstone, in Jackson county, and on that day she gave a deed of the west half to her brother, Amos Hicks, and received *322back an instrument specifying that he leased the premises to her for the term of her natural life. The deed expressed a consideration of $1500, and the lease one of $500.

April 11, 1873, and a little less than a year after this transaction, Amos Hicks died intestate, leaving a widow, Mercy Hicks, now Mercy DeForest, and as sole heirs at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mills v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. McKillip v. McKillipNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  3. McCandlish v. KeenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1857
  4. Clark v. StilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Campbell v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Peters v. TunellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Koch v. RothIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Zeiser v. . CohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Whiteley v. Central Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. Crump v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API