Ruscomb Street
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Reargued. Oct. 16, 1906. In the matter of the vacation of Ruscomb street. The case was previously argued on October 13, 1905, and an opinion filed by Rice, P. J., on April 23, 1906. The case is reported in 30 Pa. Superior Ct. 476.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
This is the same case that is reported in 30 Pa. Superior Ct. 476. As shown by the opinion, the decision there reported was based on our supposition that Twentieth street was an open street and connected with the general system of streets to the south of Rockland street. This supposition was warranted by the map or plan submitted, and we discovered nothing in either paper-book to show that the map or plan was incorrect in this particular. But it was alleged in the application for reargument, and is now conceded by counsel for the city, that the map or plan was not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Melon StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Ruscomb StreetSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
3Cited by11 opinions
- Spang & Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Hedrick v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Donnelly v. Public Service Commission & Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Holmes v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Edgemont StreetSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.