Davis v. Willig
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 305, Oct. T., 1912, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Lancaster Co., Equity Docket No. 5, page 237, dismissing bill in equity in case of B. E. Davis v. Augusta Willig et al. Bill in equity for an injunction. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was decree dismissing the bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,
The controversy in this case grows out of a dispute in regard to the title to a strip of land four and one half inches in width, along the boundary line, between the plaintiff’s and defendant’s land in the city of Lancaster. According to all the deeds offered in evidence the dividing line between the lots is a straight one from the front to the rear street lines. During the progress of certain improvements on the plaintiff’s property, a dispute arose as to the true location of the line, and an alleged party wall privilege. The appellant concedes that the question raised…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rhea v. ForsythSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
- Commonwealth v. StevensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- McCune v. LytleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Freeland v. South Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Minnig's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schumacher v. PloplisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Schumacher v. Ploplis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County1925