Legal Opinion

Schumacher v. Ploplis

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1925No. Appeal 340PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Defendants appeal from a final decree enjoining them from entering and trespassing upon certain property of plaintiff’s. The bill averred, and there was evidence to sustain a finding, that plaintiff was the owner of a lot of ground situate on the east side of Coal Street in the Borough of Port Carbon, and had been in possession of the premises since 1914; that Petronella P'loplis, one of the defendants, owned and occupied the lot of ground on Coal Street which adjoins plaintiff’s property on the south side thereof; and that Petronella Ploplis and her two sons, the other…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Carroll v. AsburySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Stivason v. SereneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Laukhuff's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Davis v. WilligSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Simpson Real Estate Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Dillon v. KlamutSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Stone v. Marks Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API