Legal Opinion

State v. Frye, 2007-A-0023 (12-21-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 2007No. 2007-A-0023PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Franklin D. Frye appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress, in a case resulting in his conviction for having a weapon while under disability, assault of a peace officer, possession of methamphetamine, and possessing criminal tools. We reverse and remand this matter.

{¶ 2} September 29, 2006, Mr. Frye was indicted by the Ashtabula County Grand Jury on five counts: Count One, illegal assembly or possession of chemicals for the manufacture of drugs, in violation of R.C. 2925.041, a third degree felony; Count Two, having weapons while under disability, in violation of R.C.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DavidOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State v. LinkOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. State v. BrunsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. State v. FryeOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. WinstonClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API