Legal Opinion

Janice J. Prioleau v. Kentucky Fried Chicken, Inc.074040)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 28, 2015No. A-99-13PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Patterson

In a series of decisions arising from personal injuries sustained by business invitees on the premises of businesses whose operations involve customer self-service, this Court has recognized a principle known as “mode of operation.” See Nisivoccia v. Glass Gardens, Inc., 175 N.J. 559, 563-65, 818 A.2d 314 (2003); Wollerman v. Grand Union Stores, Inc., 47 N.J. 426, 429-30, 221 A.2d 513 (1966); Bozza v. Vornado, Inc., 42 N.J. 355, 359-60, 200 A.2d 777 (1964). Under the mode-of-operation rule, a business invitee who is injured is entitled to an inference of negligence and is relieved of the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Viscik v. Fowler Equipment Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  4. Nisivoccia v. Glass Gardens, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  5. Bozza v. Vornado, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Annette Troupe v. Burlington Coat Factory WarehouseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
  2. Romeo v. Harrah's Atlantic City Propco, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
  3. Richard Walker v. Costco Wholesale WarehouseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
  4. Lenherr v. Morey Organization, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  5. ALEICE JETER VS. SAM'S CLUB (L-3779-17, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API