Legal Opinion
Romeo v. Harrah's Atlantic City Propco, LLC
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 10, 2016No. Civil Action No. 13-2133PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION1
Hon. Joseph H. Rodriguez, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on Motion of Defendant Harrah’s Atlantic City Propeo, LLC (“Harrah’s”) for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Principally, Harrah’s claims that it is not liable for Plaintiff Charles Romeo’s slip and fall accident at its casino because Plaintiff cannot make a prima facie case of negligence. Harrah’s argues that it did not owe a duty of care to Romeo because it lacked both actual and constructive notice of the dangerous condition that Plaintiff alleges caused his fall.
The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pearson v. Component Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Nisivoccia v. Glass Gardens, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- CHEATHAM v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- CORTES v. BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUBDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- EDWARDS v. HARRAHS ATLANTIC CITY OPERATING COMPANY, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- KING v.HARRAH'S ATLANTIC CITY OPERATING COMPANY LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- MELENDEZ v. TARGET CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.