Legal Opinion

Berry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 1992No. 1172 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRY, Senior Judge.

0. Robert Berry (Berry) appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (the Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision that denied benefits for total disability and loss of an eye for all practical intents and purposes. Berry filed a petition alleging that he lost the use of his right eye and suffered from a chronic anxiety condition due to work related stress incurred during his employment with United Minerals & Grain Corp. (UMG). UMG filed an answer denying the material allegations of the claim. Following a hearing, the referee denied benefits and the Board…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Halaski v. Hilton HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  3. Russella v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Joseph v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Boeing Vertol Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Garnett v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Halvorsen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Kuzniar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API