Berry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BARRY, Senior Judge.
0. Robert Berry (Berry) appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (the Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision that denied benefits for total disability and loss of an eye for all practical intents and purposes. Berry filed a petition alleging that he lost the use of his right eye and suffered from a chronic anxiety condition due to work related stress incurred during his employment with United Minerals & Grain Corp. (UMG). UMG filed an answer denying the material allegations of the claim. Following a hearing, the referee denied benefits and the Board…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Halaski v. Hilton HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
- Russella v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Joseph v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Boeing Vertol Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Garnett v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Nabisco Brands, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Halvorsen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Kuzniar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.