Legal Opinion

Kielbeck v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1903No. 13,180PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the district court for Furnas county: Hanson M. Grimes, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Ames, C.

The track of the defendant company extends easterly and westerly from a point in this state where there is a passenger station, and an unincorporated village called Holbrook. Immediately to the westward of the station the track is crossed at right angles by a public road. About 180 feet north from the crossing, begins a scattered row of houses on the east side of the highway, merging some distance further northward in a cluster of buildings constituting the hamlet. The station house stands on the opposite or south side of the track. From the crossing eastward along the track, 23 feet…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commissioners of Marion County v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SporerNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Quinton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Nanfito v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1919
  3. M. K. Goetz Brewing Co. v. WalnNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Schwartz v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API