Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Walters

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 27, 1916No. 6990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court. Sequoyah County : John H. Pitchford. Judge. Action by T. I'. Walters against Tom Johnson. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant ■lirrngs error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

CLAY, C.

For convenience the parties herein will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. This is an action by the plaintiff, T. F. Walters, against Tom Johnson for the balance due on a promissory note in the sum of $476, and alleging that a copy of the note could not be attached for the reason that it was left -with the defendant and by him destroyed. Defendant answered by a general denial, and denied that he ever executed or delivered any promissory note, or that any note was ever left with him or destroyed by him, and .denied he was indebted to the plaintiff in any sum…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Shenandoah Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
  2. City of Wynnewood v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. First Nat. Bank v. NewtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  4. Lomax v. Colorado National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  5. Kiser v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Exchange Bank of Commerce v. MeadorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. First Nat. Bank of Temple v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Cravens v. First State Bank of SeminoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Martin v. CooganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API