Legal Opinion

Kiser v. Nichols

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1912No. 2073PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Jackson County Court; W. T. McConnell, Judge. Action by G. C. Kiser against Nannie Nichols. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This case presents error from the county court of Jackson county. March 4, 1909, the plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, filed his petition in the said court, alleging that the defendant had in her possession, and was unlawfully detaining from him, two mules of the value of $215, for the return of which, with damages for the withholding thereof, he prayed judgment. In his petition plaintiff alleged an agreement between himself and the defendant, wherein she was to take the mules and hold the same conditionally on a proposed contract of purchase and sale of certain lands located in Pecos county,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Wynnewood v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Jeffers v. HensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Incorporated Town of Sallisaw v. ChappelleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Campbell v. BreeceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. MacKey v. NickollSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. First Nat. Bank of Temple v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Johnson v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API