Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ferrusca-Barrera v. Superintendent

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 22, 2022No. 6:20-cv-02275Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON ALEJANDRO FERRUSCA-BARRERA, Case No. 6:20-cv-02275-MC Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER v. SUPERINTENDENT, STATE OF OREGON, Respondent. _____________________________________ MCSHANE, District Judge. Petitioner brings this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

challenging his convictions for sexual abuse. Petitioner contends that his trial counsel provided constitutionally ineffective assistance by failing to move for severance of charges involving different victims. The state court rejected petitioner’s claim in a decision…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Brown v. PaytonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API