Legal Opinion
Kennedy v. Freeman
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided April 20, 1989No. 88-C-1466-BPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRETT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Robert G. Freeman, M.D. and Robert G. Freeman, M.D., P.A. Defendants contend the Court lacks in personam jurisdiction over them. The precise issue before the Court is: Does this Court have in personam jurisdiction over a nonresident physician and his professional association when the cause of action is for negligent diagnosis and analysis of skin cancer rendered in a foreign state (Texas) and the errors are reported back to the forum state (Oklahoma) where the wrong treatment is administered.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marsha Lee Kennedy and Stephen Michael Kennedy v. Robert G. Freeman, M.D. And Robert G. Freeman, P.A., a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- PRESBYTERIAN UNIVERSTIY HOSPITAL v. WilsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- PRESBYTERIAN UNIVERSTIY HOSPITAL v. WilsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994