Legal Opinion

Hill v. City of Urbana

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1997No. 95-1924PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The question presented by this case is whether the Political Subdivision Tort Liability Act (“Act”), as codified in R.C. Chapter 2744, gives immunity to the city of Urbana, appellee, under the facts of this case. No more than just a reading of the statute is required to answer this question in the negative. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

The parties raise several issues for our possible consideration. Implicitly raised is the question of the constitutionality of the doctrine of sovereign immunity as applied to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. In re M.D.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Garrett v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Ranells v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Cater v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Greene County Agricultural Society v. LimingOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Turner v. Central Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cater v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Greene Cty. Agricultural Soc. v. LimingOhio Supreme Court · 2000

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API