Legal Opinion

Simmons First National Bank v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided December 4, 1980No. PB-C-79-181PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WOODS, District Judge.

Plaintiff has filed a Motion for New Trial based on the affidavits of two jurors as to matters occurring in the jury room. The principal contention is that one of the jurors coerced and harassed the other jurors into agreeing with her. These affidavits are clearly inadmissible under Rule 606(b), Federal Rules of Evidence, reading as follows:

Inquiry into validity of verdict or indictment. Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury’s deliberations or to the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. United States v. Franklin Delano GipsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. NarcisoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Julian S. H. WEINER, Marvin Al Lichtig and Solomon Block, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. CasamayorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  2. State v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. United States v. FranklinDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1982
  4. City of Bismarck v. BauerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Thompson v. Papastavros Associates Medical Imaging, L.L.C.Superior Court of Delaware · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API