Legal Opinion

United States v. Virgil Redmond

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 4, 1977No. 75-1767, 75-1781 and 75-1782PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SETH, Circuit Judge.

The defendants, Virgil Redmond, Carl Powers, and Francis Lund, together with a corporate defendant, were charged under 15 U.S.C. §§ 77q(a) and 77x with the use of the mails in the fraudulent sale of securities. The case was tried to a jury, and each defendant was found guilty on eight counts. The court sentenced the individual defend ants to a total of eighteen years. Each defendant was also fined $40,000.00.

The Government sought to prove that the defendants engaged in a scheme to defraud investors by selling stock following various mergers between Rio de Oro Mining…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. Arthur J. PorthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  5. United States of America, Palintiff-Appellee v. Bruce Loren LatimerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. Phillip TroutmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Daniel M. Paradies, the Paradies Shops, Inc., Paradies Midfield Corporation, Ira JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Jose JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Arthur P. Tranakos, United States of America v. William PilgrimCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Amos PinoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API