Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. O'HARRAH

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 13, 1953PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANLEY, Commissioner.

The Commonwealth asks a certification of the law with respect to the validity of an indictment to which a demurrer was sustained. In responding, we run into a grave constitutional question involving the personal privileges and immunities of the citizen. Near the close of the spring term, the submission of this case was set aside and an order entered requesting briefs on the question and related points. The Attorney General has filed an able' brief, hut Mr. Daniel W. Davies, who represented the ap-pellee as defendant below, has made no response whatever. This we must…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Fairbank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Commonwealth v. BarneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  5. State v. WallerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Fannin v. WilliamsKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hayes v. State Property & Buildings CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Kelley v. HudsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  5. Sweasy v. King's Daughters Memorial HospitalKentucky Supreme Court · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API