Legal Opinion

Byrd v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 20, 2020No. 4/20PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dale K. Byrd v. State of Maryland, No. 4, September Term, 2020 CRIMINAL LAW – DISCOVERY Prior to a defendant entering a pretrial guilty plea, the State is under no constitutional obligation to provide a defendant with evidence that could be used to impeach a State’s witness. CRIMINAL LAW – DISCOVERY The failure by the State to provide evidence to the defendant, prior to pleading guilty, that could be used to impeach a State’s witness does not constitute a misrepresentation by the State regarding the credibility of that witness under Brady v. United States. Circuit Court for Baltimore City…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance v. CassillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Blake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  3. Attorney Grievance v. CassillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Canales-Yanez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API