Blake v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
William Samuel Blake v. State of Maryland, Misc. No. 2, September Term, 2022, Opinion by Booth, J. CRIMINAL LAW — INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL — STATE’S OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE Pursuant to Maryland Rule 8-304, the Supreme Court of Maryland issued a writ of certiorari accepting two certified questions from the Appellate Court of Maryland, which it slightly rephrased as follows: 1. Did the post-conviction court err by ruling that trial counsel had not rendered ineffective assistance by failing to move to compel production of the Internal Affairs Division files and other…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Syed v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Coyle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- Danshin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- State Bd. of Elections v. AmbridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- State v. BrandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.