Legal Opinion

Canales-Yanez v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 29, 2021No. 11/20Published

1Opinion of the Court

Jose Canales-Yanez v. State of Maryland, No. 11, September Term, 2020 BRADY VIOLATIONS – STANDARD OF REVIEW A trial court’s determination as to the existence of a violation of Brady v. Maryland, following either a bench or jury trial, is a constitutional question subject to de novo review. The defendant bears the burden of establishing a Brady violation and must show that: (1) the government suppressed or withheld evidence, (2) that would have been favorable to the defense, and (3) that would have been material to the trial, meaning that there is a reasonable probability that it would have…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API