Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Workforce Services

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 9, 2022No. 20210763-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

2022 UT App 110

THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS MARIE BINGHAM, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES, Respondent. Opinion No. 20210763-CA Filed September 9, 2022 Original Proceeding in this Court Marie Bingham, Petitioner Pro Se Robert D. Andreasen, Attorney for Respondent JUDGE GREGORY K. ORME authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER and DAVID N. MORTENSEN concurred. ORME, Judge: ¶1 Marie Bingham seeks judicial review of the decision by the Appeals Board (the Board) of the Department of Workforce Services (the Department) affirming the decision of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Jordan River Restoration NetworkUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Plumb v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Cooper Valves, LLC and Barry Don Hoeffner v. ValvTechnologies, IncCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. VanLeeuwen v. Industrial Com'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Millet v. Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API