Legal Opinion
Millet v. Workforce Services
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided November 2, 2023No. 20220741-CAPublished
1Opinion of the Court
2023 UT App 129
THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS SHAREE H. MILLET, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES, Respondent. Opinion No. 20220741-CA Filed November 2, 2023 Original Proceeding in this Court David J. Holdsworth, Attorney for Petitioner Robert D. Andreasen, Attorney for Respondent JUDGE RYAN M. HARRIS authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN FORSTER and DAVID N. MORTENSEN concurred. HARRIS, Judge: ¶1 Sharee H. Millet obtained unemployment benefits through the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) program. Later, the Utah Department of Workforce Services (the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Autoliv ASP, Inc. v. Workforce Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
- VanLeeuwen v. Industrial Com'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1995
- Armstrong v. Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- Kirkwood v. Department of Employment Security, Board of Review, Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Record v. Workforce Appeals Board, Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.