Wilson v. Heckler
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RUSSELL E. SMITH, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a final order of the Secretary denying the plaintiffs application for supplemental Social Security income benefits. 1 The Secretary determined that plaintiff was not entitled to the benefits, because she was considered to be married to a man whose resources exceeded the sum of $2,250. 42 U.S.C. § 1382(a)(2)(B). The only question in this case is whether the adjudication that plaintiff was considered to be married was correct. The governing statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1382c(d)(2), reads:(d) In determining whether two individuals…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Oglala Sioux Tribe of Indians v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Christine Lemaster v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Leonard P. Stuckey v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Ethel M. Munsinger v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gerstein v. BowenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Mines v. BowenDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1989
- KIRCHNER v. KIJAKAZIDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022