Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Heckler

District Court, D. Montana

Decided September 17, 1985No. CV 84-41-MPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

RUSSELL E. SMITH, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a final order of the Secretary denying the plaintiffs application for supplemental Social Security income benefits. 1 The Secretary determined that plaintiff was not entitled to the benefits, because she was considered to be married to a man whose resources exceeded the sum of $2,250. 42 U.S.C. § 1382(a)(2)(B). The only question in this case is whether the adjudication that plaintiff was considered to be married was correct. The governing statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1382c(d)(2), reads:(d) In determining whether two individuals…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Oglala Sioux Tribe of Indians v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  3. Christine Lemaster v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  4. Leonard P. Stuckey v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. Ethel M. Munsinger v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. BowenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  2. Mines v. BowenDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1989
  3. KIRCHNER v. KIJAKAZIDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API