Legal Opinion
Mines v. Bowen
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 19, 1989No. CV 85-3565 TJHPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HATTER, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs, Robert Mines, Carolyn J. Howard and Gary Roberts seek disability benefits from the Social Security Administration, under Social Security Title II, (Old Age, Survivors, Disability Benefits), XVI (Supplemental Security Income) and XVIII (Medicare), Title XVI and Title XVIII Programs, and, as class representatives, challenge the administrative review policies of the defendant, Otis R. Bowen, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”).
Although the initial determination and preliminary review procedures…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gaynell McCuin v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Harvey B. RAZEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Ethel M. Munsinger v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Charles P. Cieutat v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Joseph D. BUTTERWORTH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mines v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Mines v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992