Legal Opinion
State v. KRASZYK ET UX.
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 16, 1960No. 29,822PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
This action was commenced under the provisions of Acts 1905, ch. 48, §1, p. 59, being §3-1701, Burns’ 1946 Replacement, by the State of Indiana to appropriate and condemn certain lands of appellees, Chester Kraszyk and Mary Rose Kraszyk, and Garner Phegley, for a right of way for the construction of a limited access highway in Starke County, as provided by the Acts of 1945, ch. 245, being §36-3101, et seq., Burns’ 1949 Replacement.
In accordance with the prayer of the complaint appraisers were duly appointed, and they assessed the damages accruing to appellees by reason of the appropriation of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Public Service Commission v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Schnull v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1921
- State Etc. v. Marion Cir. Ct. Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Sterne v. VertIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- McGrew v. GraystonIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dager v. Indiana Suburban Sewers, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1970
- Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. LouckIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
- Sidebottom v. SidebottomIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
- State Ex Rel. City of Hammond v. LA PORTE CIR. CT.Indiana Supreme Court · 1968
- New Haven Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.