Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Bowen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1923No. 24,512PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*642The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

The controversy presented on this appeal involves the ownership and right to the possession of a strip of land adjoining lot 128 in ward 7 of the city of Manhattan.

Prior to December 18, 1912, Inez Fay Rowe owned the lot and upon that date she executed a deed purporting to convey it to Emma H. Bowen. About a month before the execution of the deed the city had vacated the street on which the lot adjoined and the strip in controversy is one-half of the vacated street adj acent to the lot conveyed. It was alleged in plaintiff's amended…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. PatchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. City of Belleville v. HallowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. Challiss v. Atchison Union Depot & RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. Showalter v. Southern Kansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  5. Haseltine v. NussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marks v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Smith v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Roxana Petroleum Corporation v. SutterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API