Legal Opinion

City of Belleville v. Hallowell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from Republic District Court. Injunction. Judgment for the plaintiffs Hallowell and Phillips, on January 28,1887. The defendant City brings the case to this court. The opinion states the material facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

The defendants in ei’ror commenced their action against the city of Belleville, a city of the third class, to perpetually enjoin said city from an interference with their possession of a lot of ground owned by them, which originally was a part of an alley running east and west through block seventeen, according to the original survey and recorded plat of said city. It is alleged, among other things, that all of that part of the alley that was located between lots four and five of said block had been duly vacated by ordinance, on the petition of the owners of all the lots…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Sleeper v. Bullen & DustinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  3. Central Branch U. P. R. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lines v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Benson v. City of De SotoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. John Ritchie & Sons v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Challiss v. Atchison Union Depot & RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  5. Goodwin v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API