Legal Opinion

Bell v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 30, 1965No. 41143PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Judge.

“Liability of a parent for the tort of a child is governed by the ordinary principles of liability of a principal for the acts of 'his agent, or a master for his servant. It does not arise out of a mere relation of parent and child.” Chastain v. Johns, 120 Ga. 977, 978 (48 SE 343, 66 LRA 958). This rule still obtains except as modified by Code Ann. § 105-113. This action, however, does not seek to recover against defendant for negligence of his son for which defendant might be liable under agency principles. Instead, it is based upon charges of negligence committed by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Williams v. GrierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Andrews & Co. v. KinselSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Hulsey v. HightowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Foster v. VickerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Chastain v. JohnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Corley v. LewlessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Livaditis v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Glean v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Chester v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Dunaway v. KaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API