Glean v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
1. Where liability of a parent for the tort of a child is based on the parental relationship, the imputation of negligence must stem from an agency or master-and-servant relationship. Bell v. Adams, 111 Ga. App. 819 (1) (143 SE2d 413), holding that a parent was not liable where the 17-year-old son intentionally shot another with the father’s riñe, which had been left in a place accessible to him, in the absence of allegations showing the parent should have foreseen that the son, if in possession of the weapon, would commit a criminal act.
2. Insofar as the petition alleges…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Cook v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Assurance Co. of America v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Clinton v. Gunn-Willis Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Mills v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Spivey Ex Rel. Spivey v. SheelerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
- Corley v. LewlessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Blackwell v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Scarboro v. LaukCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Teter v. ClemensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.