Legal Opinion

Glean v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 5, 1967No. 42640PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

1. Where liability of a parent for the tort of a child is based on the parental relationship, the imputation of negligence must stem from an agency or master-and-servant relationship. Bell v. Adams, 111 Ga. App. 819 (1) (143 SE2d 413), holding that a parent was not liable where the 17-year-old son intentionally shot another with the father’s riñe, which had been left in a place accessible to him, in the absence of allegations showing the parent should have foreseen that the son, if in possession of the weapon, would commit a criminal act.

2. Insofar as the petition alleges…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Cook v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Assurance Co. of America v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Clinton v. Gunn-Willis Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  5. Mills v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Spivey Ex Rel. Spivey v. SheelerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
  2. Corley v. LewlessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  3. Blackwell v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. Scarboro v. LaukCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Teter v. ClemensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API