Legal Opinion

Chastain v. Johns

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 12, 1904PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Reid. City court of Atlanta. October 21, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtCandler, J.

According to the petition, Mark Chastain, the minor son of the defendant in the court below, did on a named day “maliciously and negligently shoot, injure and kill, with a rifle, gún, or other instrument of death, one horse, one hog, and other stock, cattle, and hogs of petitioner,” damaging her one thousand dollars. She alleged that the defendant, as the father and natural guardian of the youthful cause of the trouble, is “ liable for all loss and injury caused by all acts or torts committed by ” him. It was not alleged that the father participated in, connived at, or. had any knowledge of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lockett v. PittmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Griffin v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. King v. SmytheTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Hubert v. HarpeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Brittingham v. . StadiemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API