Legal Opinion
Pa. Rest. & Lodging Ass'n v. City of Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 17, 2019No. 57 WAP 2017; 58 WAP 2017; 59 WAP 2017; 60 WAP 2017; 61 WAP 2017; 62 WAP 2017; 63 WAP 2017; 64 WAP 2017PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wecht
*815Pennsylvania long has sought to balance carefully the time-honored prerogatives of local governance with the countervailing state interest in providing a hospitable environment for commercial activity. In its recent enactment of two ordinances that impose certain obligations upon local businesses, the City of Pittsburgh approached the fulcrum between these competing priorities. The Paid Sick Days Act ("PSDA"),1 as its name suggests, entitles *816employees to accrue paid sick leave. The Safe and Secure Buildings Act ("SSBA")2 imposes education and training obligations upon building owners and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Protz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Adams Outdoor Advertising L.P. v. RPM Realty CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Apartment Assoc. of Met. Pittsburgh, Inc. v. The City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Apt Assoc of Metro Pgh v. City of Pgh, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Apt Assoc of Metro Pgh v. City of Pgh, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Apt Assoc. of Metro Pgh v. City of Pgh, PetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.